A highly interesting interview with Paul Collier on refugee policy and development aid by Andreas Sator from DerStandard. Currently the British development economist is supporting the German government in changing their approach towards Africa.

Insulting and foolish

In our refugee policy we have been bringing the same model to perfection for 60 years: providing free food and free shelter in camps. But what has been appropriate in the 1950s is insulting and foolish today. Insulting, because it deprives people of their dignity by not giving them the opportunity to earn their living. Foolish, because it is expensive. Displaced people like to stay in countries close to where they come from. Most importantly, they need the right to work. And instead of thinking in humanitarian silos, they need city-like settlements with a functioning power supply and other infrastructures, decent logistics  and a legal environment to be able to establish a proper business. Europe and the West should do, what they can do best: send their companies to create jobs. And provide money. International companies should get incentives to set up production facilities in industrial zones close-by the big refugee settlements, e.g. in Jordan.

Development Aid

Collier looks at the stunning success of China in reducing poverty. What happened there, will happen in Africa. “Scale and specialization is the only path we know to get out of mass poverty!” This makes productivity raise and allows people to increase their income. “No country develops except through private investment.” In last 20 years we overemphasized the social agenda. Thus, we should incentivize international companies to invest in African countries. For first movers it is always more risky and more expensive. That is why we should subsidize and support them. “The answer is not to stop aid, but to spend aid sensibly!”   Listen to the whole interview here. The English spoken interview starts at minute 3:24:   https://soundcloud.com/nachfrage/so-losen-wir-das-fluchtlingsproblem-fur-immer-paul-collier   In my book Der Schwarze Tiger – Was wir von Afrika lernen können I refer to the “flying geese model”. This is what Collier is describing, when talking about China and the industrialization of African countries. Read here (in German only, sorry!): Der Schwarze Tiger-Auszug Fluggaensemodell

Similar Posts

  • Western Aid at the Crossroads

    “Yes, that’s like it is!” has always been the answer when putting forward to an aid practitioner the principle of permanent acceleration: When a certain type of project or program has become mainstream, right before results are visible, the aid community moves on to the next, much more ambitious and difficult task. The new book on Western…

  • The End of Development Aid – We have to talk about it!

    John Mc Arthur, economist and a Visiting Fellow with the Brookings Institution, has done an interesting calculation. In his blog post How Much Aid is Required to End Extreme Poverty? he came to the conclusion that required funds to meet basic services for the extreme poor of the world have dropped from 450 bn USD in 1990 to 200…

  • Relaunch development aid

    Does Africa still need aid? The short answer: double humanitarian assistance, transfer the rest into a policy for networking, interlinking and steering migration flows….

  • How Racist Roots backfire on Development Aid …

    … and make it increasingly irrelevant ” … we must embark on a bold new program for making the benefits of our scientific advances and industrial progress available for the improvement and growth of underdeveloped areas. More than half the people of the world are living in conditions approaching misery. Their food is inadequate. They are victims…

  • Hidden Champions – Europe’s hidden contribution to the globalized world

    The (Central) European model of hidden champions is one of the most promising alternatives for continued global economic development. Contrary to the authoritarian Asian model of state capitalism it is able to tackle the complexities of our newly globalized world; contrary to the US shareholder value capitalism it is based on value creation in the…